Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Antibody Titrations


After the post below regarding the Alexa Dye conjugations, I had a few questions from users, not about the Alexa Dyes available, but about the titration, and choosing the optimal antibody concentration. Titrating your antibodies will go a long way towards achieving good quality flow cytometry data. A properly titered antibody will allow you to achieve the optimal separation between positive and negative without unnecessarily wasting antibody. This should appeal to you in multiple ways; better data, fewer experiments, and saving money. Below I will share with you the UCFlow, fool-proof method for antibody titration.

The first things to look at are, what's your antibody, which cells should I use to titrate, and in which state do the cells need to be for maximal staining? The 1st one's a no-brainer, but what you should be aware of is on which instrument (i.e. lasers and filters) you'll need to run this antibody:fluorochrome pair. Other things to be aware of is what is the species, specificity, and isotype of the antibody in question. This may impact what type of blocking may be necessary. For example, a rat anti mouse IgG2a may require the use of an anti-Fc receptor blocking antibody (for example 2.4G2) prior to staining in order to minimize non-specific binding of the native Fc receptors by the rat antibody. Another example would be if you needed to stain human blood cells with a rabbit anti-human Ig. In this case, you may pre-incubate the cells in normal rabbit serum to avoid non-specific staining. Next, we'll need some cells on which we'll titrate the antibody, and we'll need to know in which state these cells need to be in order to achieve max expression of the antigen. Take, for example anti-mouse CD44. CD44 is expressed on multiple cell types (bone marrow myeloid cells, peripheral T cells, etc...), and at different levels on the same cell type (upregulated on peripheral T cells), so you want to make sure there is enough antibody to sufficiently stain the highest expression level without using so much antibody that your background is too high. So, in a case like this, it may be better to either use mouse bone marrow, or perhaps activate peripheral lymphocytes to achieve the highest expression level you may encounter.

Now that we know what and with what we will test, we can proceed to the actual testing. If forced to take a stab in the dark at an optimal antibody concentration for flow cytometry, I'd guess 1ug of antibody in a final volume of 100ul of anywhere from a couple hundred thousand to a couple million cells. With this information, I generally start my titration 10 times that value, and stain my 1st sample with 10ug of antibody in 100ul of cells ( i typically use 500,000 cells, but that's not as important as keeping the volume of the sample consistent). From there, I do 3-fold serial dilutions down to 0.005ug, which gives a total of 8 tubes. I do all the staining in a 96 well plate, so each antibody being tested conveniently fits in 1 column. So the math pretty much goes like this. Take 15ul of the antibody (if stock is at 1mg/ml concentration) and put it into A1. Put 10ul of buffer into A2 - A8. Take 5ul from A1, mix into A2 (thereby creating a 3-fold dilution) and repeat serially down the plate. Be sure to remove the 5ul extra from A8 and discard. So, each well has 10ul of the properly diluted antibody. To each well, I add 90ul of previously blocked cells (remember, you were suppose to block the Fc receptor with 2.4G2 - this can be done in bulk prior to putting the cells into the wells). Incubate, 15 minutes at 4C, wash 2x with PBS + 1%BSA, and resuspend in 250ul of PBS +1%BSA. Also be sure to save a small amount of the cells alone (i.e. unstained) for setting up the instrument. Set up the cytometer with the appropriate lasers and filters, and collect data files. You may ask yourself, what if my stock antibody is at a lower concentration, or, what if I'm using an antibody with unknown concentration because the vendor only told me to use 1ul per "test." First, call the vendor and demand the concentration, they may not give it to you, but if enough people complain maybe they'll get the picture that real scientists like to work with known numbers not arbitrary ones like "tests." Secondly, if you are told to use 1ul per test, you can pretty much assume that's way too much antibody (since they want you to waste antibody so you'll buy more), so maybe my top concentration would be 3ul/test, and do a 3-fold dilution from there.

Lastly, we can analyze the data and generate the metric called the Stain Index. Perform standard gating of the population of interested (e.g. lymphocyte gate, live gate, myeloid gate, etc...). For the antibody titration channel, you will need to set a gate based on the 10ug sample which best separates the data into positive and negative groups. You'll then need to move the gates down as the positive population gets dimmer (see Titration Image). You can try to use the magnetic gate feature, but it doesn't always work that well. Once you have the positive and negative populations gated, you'll want to request the Standard Deviation of the negative population and the Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) of both neg and pos. The stain index can then be calculated as (MFIpos - MFIneg)/SDneg. A scatter plot of Log Antibody Concentration versus Stain Index should yield a curve whose max Stain Index is the optimal concentration (See Stain Index Image).

And there you go, a very easy way to get to the ideal concentration of antibody for flow cytometry. Remember, the concentration is critical, so we always try to stain in a final volume of 100ul. If you need to stain large numbers of cells, for example if you are sorting, then you'll need to increase the volume, and the concentration as well (probably never more than 1mL, though). If you plan to do this routinely, then a smaller scale titration (3 or 4 tubes instead of 8) may be necessary.

Friday, June 12, 2009

Alexa Dye Antibody Conjugation


The Fitch Monoclonal Antibody Facility (MAF) on campus is now offering antibodies coupled to many of the Alexa dye flavors from Invitrogen. As you may know, the Alexa Dyes are small molecular weight fluorochromes capable of producing bright fluorescence and minimal photo-bleaching. These dyes are available in many wavelengths, and are named by their optimal excitation wavelength, for example Alexa 488 is optimally excited by the 488 laser, while Alexa 568 is optimally excited by a 568nm Laser. The facility is offering commonly used antibodies coupled to various Alexa dyes for purchase in small and large aliquot sizes. The coupled antibodies will be tested and titrated by the Flow Cytometry Facility as a quality assurance measure. Most recently the MAF coupled Alexa 488 to a Rat anti-Mouse CD4 antibody (clone GK1.5), the titration is shown in the embedded image. For more information on which antibodies are slated to join the mix, or how you can get your homebrewed antibodies coupled to an Alexa Dye, contact the Monoclonal Facility at 702-8756, or contact the Technical Director, Carol McShan at mcs7 'at' uchicago 'dot' edu.

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Live from Beckman Coulter Big Bang Event

I'm here at the Embassy Suites in Rosemont, IL for the big event. I'll post some updates as the day progresses, and possibly a few pics as well. There's a pretty decent turnout, maybe about 50-75 people. We're just getting underway! More later.

0913: Picomotor driven laser steering optics for fine tuning laser alignment...awesome

0914: Gallios = Research Instrument, Navios = Clinical Instrument.

0917: A vendor has talked about instrument "sensitivity" without quoting MESF detection threshold values...There really is a God! It's good to see my ranting and raving has not been in vain.

0924: The boulevard. Coulter's answer to the "Octagon". 18 degree reflection system which minimizes light loss.

0930: Definitely some nice innovation on the light scattering front. "Enhanced FSC" mode allowed resolution of 0.4um beads from noise as well as from 0.5um beads.

0948: FCS file is packed with all the necessary information to reproduce the experiment. (MIFlow?, XML compatible?)

0958: PROService - Remote diagnostic of software/hardware issues. Can control laser picomotors for remote alignment.

1045: Why we are getting a lecture on tandem dyes is beyond me, but oh well, at least I can get some work done in the
meantime. Hopefully we'll get back to the instrumentation soon.

1105: Kaluza - Named after German Mathematician and Physicist Theodore Kaluza

1355: By the way, Kaluza is awesome. Super snappy! Eats up large data files like nothing. Still not too sure about the fancy new tools like Radar, but it could be useful.

1410: MoFlo XDP overview. pretty much what you'd expect. The one nice thing is Intellisort II, which is basically a 1-button stream setup and drop-delay calculation. It does everything from setting the frequency, drop drive amplitude, phase, drop delay, everything.

1530: The MoFlo Astrios - Pretty much an attempt to automate many of the tasks needed to set up the MoFlo. 7-pinholes, 6-way sorting. Interestingly, the 7-pinholes take up the same vertical space as the 3-pinholes did on the MoFlo-XDP. This basically means that the beam height must be really small (~10um high?). So does a fully loaded system not have huge amounts of crossbeam spillover? Even after appropriately ordering the beams (e.g. put the UV next to the 640nm, and keep the 488nm away from the 532nm, etc...) there is still going to be some problems. I can only imagine that the hope is most people will want a 4 or 5-laser system at most, and then they can stagger the lines a bit more. What's the likelihood one will want to run all 7 lasers at the same time...probably pretty low. the 7-pinhole thing may simply be a marketing tool, but I could easily be proven wrong once I see some data. Hopefully later this year then.

1600: That's about all. Hopefully if you weren't able to attend, you got a peek at what went on here. signing off.

Friday, May 15, 2009

Never orphan your data again.

Picture this, you just finished running your samples on the Canto in R409, you've exported your data to the BDExport folder, and you reach into your pocket. Dang! You forgot your USB drive. You could walk all the way back to your lab in Billings in the pouring rain, but wait, you can just email the files to yourself. So, you log into the University's webmail system compose your email to yourself, attach your zipped folder of FCS files and you click send only to get a error that the file is too big to be sent over the University's network. What to do now? Do you just chance it and hope the computer doesn't crash before you come back tomorrow with your USB drive? I know I wouldn't. There is one other thing you can do. You can use NSIT's web-based file storage and sharing service. That's right, just by being a member of the University with a CNET ID, you can put up to 50MB 1GB of data on a server share and then pull it down at your desk. Just visit nsit.uchicago.edu/webshare and log in with your CNET and Password and voila, instant "USB Drive." Now grant it, it's not a ton of space, and it should really be 50GB, not 50MB 1GB, but, in a pinch, it may help. By the way, the powers that be can see/read whatever's on the server, so don't put any unencrypted personal information on there. Update: When I logged in, it was actually showing 1GB of space not 50MB like I had originally thought. YIPPEE!

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Annual Core Fair, Thursday 5/14/09, Free Food!

Well, it's that time of year again. The Office of Shared Research Facilities (OSRF) is hosting its annual Core Fair this Thursday from 12:00 to 1:30 PM in the Gordon Center Atrium. Technical Directors and staff from over 21 core facilities will be available to discuss services, hand out literature and display posters featuring Core capabilities. The Flow Facility will have a table set up to showcase some of its new toys and services including information on its newly upgraded FACSAria II, its 4-laser LSRII, the new 561nm laser line on the MoFlo, and perennial favorite, the BioPlex. So you'll definitely want to stop by and get any and all your questions answered on how the techno-savvy core facilities can assist you in your research. As always, if you have questions regarding the services available from any core facility, visit the OSRF web site at osrf.uchicago.edu, and for any questions regarding Flow Cytometry Instrumetation and Services, you can certainly contact us or visit our web site (if you're not already there) at ucflow.uchicago.edu.

Monday, April 27, 2009

Beckman Coulter Resurfaces - Attend a Roadshow for info

It's remarkable to think that, until recently, the newest offering from Beckman Coulter was the FC500 (not counting acquisitions, like the Cyan and MoFlo)! It seems as though that is changing, rapidly. Beckman Coulter has recently announced two new players in the flow cytometer world. First up is the 3-laser, 10-color analyzer, Gallios. It seems pretty nice. I haven't gotten my hands on it yet, so I cannot give you the full run-down on it. They've certainly fixed a few problems that are found in their previous instrument (Colinear beams, more efficient light collection, better electronics, etc.) and so I'm sure it will be a huge step up from an FC500. However, there is still one thing that bugs me. It's billed as a RUO (research use only) instrument yet it has a tube carousel with a barcode reader on it!!! Seriously, who, outside of a clinical lab, uses a barcode system for their tubes. I find these carousel type loading systems to be really slow. I'd much rather pop tubes on and off, start and stop, add more buffer on the fly whenever I want. Instead, now I'm forced to use a carousel, and let it run. Not too happy about that. I do appreciate, however, the attention provided to light scattering. Light scattering seems like an afterthought on flow cytometers, but the Gallios has a forward scatter detector that can be optimized for small or large particles by adjusting the range of low angle light scatter detected. A wide position setting (1 to 19 degrees off normal) allows you to focus on smaller objects (bacteria, for example), while a narrow position (1 to 8 degrees) is ideal for larger cells. Lastly, you can use an enhanced wide angle module to focus in on submicron particle resolution. The data from this looks very promising.

The other new kid on the block is the Astrios (not sure about all the astronomical names), Coulter's new high-end cell sorter. First thing to note is, as I'm told, this is not a replacement of the MoFlo-XDP. The XDP will still be offered and developed. For how long? Who knows. The Astrios looks phenomenal. Here are a few stats: 6-way sorting, 7 spatially separated lasers, up to 30 fluorescence parameters, 0.3% Coincidence at 80,000 cells per second (cells, NOT beads). Is this for real? Time will tell, but after I wipe the drool from my mouth, I hope to get a test drive of this bad boy.

Along with the instruments, they will soon be releasing what I consider to be one of the best data analysis software packages around. Not just flow cytometry software, any data analysis software from any data intensive technology. It's called Kaluza, and it makes analyzing large data sets so easy and fast. I'm a FlowJo man, but the way this processes huge data files like it's nothing could turn anyone into a switcher. You just need to check it out to see it.

Speaking of checking things out, if you're in the Chicago-land area on May 21st, you can get an up-close-and-personal look at some of this technology. It's called the Flow Cytometry Big Bang Road Show, and it's coming to Chicago on May 21st, from 9AM to 4:30PM. More info can be found on the flow-centric Beckman-Coulter web site: www.coulterflow.com Or you can just go ahead and register for it here.

Friday, April 17, 2009

What is MFI?

If you've read any papers with flow cytometry data in it, undoubtedly you've come across the abbreviation, MFI. Generically, people expand this to Mean Fluorescence Intensity, but ironically, you'd rarely use the actual Mean of the population. Basically what the MFI is suppose to measure is the shift in fluorescence intensity of a population of cells. In cases where the entire population stains with different levels of an antibody (like measuring expression level of antigen x), it would be appropriate to report relative MFI values based on some sort of control (unstained, isotype, FMO, etc...) to demonstrate an increase or decrease in expression of this marker (assuming that each sample was stained with saturating amounts of antibody, and all samples were run under the same conditions and instrument settings blah, blah, blah). So, if you wanted to make measurements like this, what statistics would you use? When you analyze your data in software (e.g. FlowJo) you are given options to calculate the Mean, Median, Mode, and Geometric Mean. I've included a link which explains these measures in terms of flow cytometry data pretty well, so i won't bother going through that here. But, I will give you the punchline. When in doubt, use Median Fluorescence Intensity. Mean is pretty much useless, it doesn't work too well on a log scale, and for non-normal distributions, it is easily affected by outliers. I don't mean to be so mean when talking about the mean, but hey, for flow data on a log scale, why bother (sorry, i couldn't resist with the 'mean' pun). If you feel you must use an arithmetic average on a log scale, use Geometric Mean.